A STEM-Driven 3D modeling experiment with tinkercad and tangible materials: A comparison of tpack and engineering design in terms of self-efficacy
| dc.authorid | 0000-0002-3593-8547 | |
| dc.authorid | 0000-0002-2320-9427 | |
| dc.contributor.author | Akbay, Burcu | |
| dc.contributor.author | Ürek, Handan | |
| dc.contributor.author | Sarıoğlan, Ayberk Bostan | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-03-06T11:03:50Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2025 | |
| dc.department | Fakülteler, Necatibey Eğitim Fakültesi, Matematik ve Fen Bilimleri Eğitimi Bölümü | |
| dc.description.abstract | The aim of this study was to explore the impact of models individually prepared by preservice teachers for the topic of solar and lunar eclipses on their STEM-technological pedagogical content knowledge self-efficacy and their perception of self-efficacy in engineering design skills. In this context, our exploration was carried out in 2×2 factorial experimental design with 31 preservice science teachers in their last year of training. Accordingly, 16 preservice teachers were assigned to a modeling group that would use tangible materials and 15 preservice teachers to a group that would use Tinkercad. Data for the study were collected in the form of a pre- and posttest with the STEM-Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (STEM-TPACK) Self-Efficacy Scale and the Engineering Design Skills Self-Efficacy Perception Scale. The data were analyzed with the ANOVA test for two-way mixed measures. Our findings revealed a significant difference in the participants’ STEM-TPACK self-efficacy in favor of the Tinkercad group. On the other hand, no significant difference was found in the perception of self-efficacy between the two groups in terms of engineering design skills. Our conclusion was that while the preservice teachers’ perception of self-efficacy in engineering design skills could be improved with the help of both digital and tangible materials, it was important to note that their self-efficacy with respect to technological pedagogical content knowledge needed to be bolstered with updated programs. | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1007/s10956-025-10276-3 | |
| dc.identifier.endpage | 15 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1059-0145 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1573-1839 | |
| dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-105021059600 | |
| dc.identifier.scopusquality | Q1 | |
| dc.identifier.startpage | 1 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-025-10276-3 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12462/23402 | |
| dc.identifier.wos | WOS:001610242800001 | |
| dc.identifier.wosquality | Q1 | |
| dc.indekslendigikaynak | Web of Science | |
| dc.language.iso | en | |
| dc.publisher | Springer Netherlands | |
| dc.relation.ispartof | Journal of Science Education and Technology | |
| dc.relation.publicationcategory | Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı | |
| dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess | |
| dc.subject | Science Education | |
| dc.subject | Models | |
| dc.subject | Design | |
| dc.subject | Preservice Teachers | |
| dc.title | A STEM-Driven 3D modeling experiment with tinkercad and tangible materials: A comparison of tpack and engineering design in terms of self-efficacy | |
| dc.type | Article |












