dc.contributor.author | Kon, Okan | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-05-16T19:32:20Z | |
dc.date.available | 2019-05-16T19:32:20Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2017 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 2146-0957 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12462/3789 | |
dc.description.abstract | In this study, five different cities were selected from the five climatic
zones according to Turkish standard TS 825, and insulation thicknesses of
exterior walls of sample buildings were calculated by using optimization.
Vertical perforated bricks with density of 550 kg/m3
and 1000
kg/m3werechosen within the study content. Glass wool, expanded
polystyrene (XPS), extruded polystyrene (EPS) were considered as
insulation materials. Additionally, natural gas, coal, fuel oil and LPG were
utilized as fuel for heating process while electricity was used for cooling.
Life cycle cost (LCC) analysis and degree-day method were the
approaches for optimum insulation thickness calculations. As a result, in
case of usage vertical perforated bricks with density of 550 kg/m3
and
1000 kg/m3
resulted different values in between 0.005-0.007 m (5-7 mm)
in the optimum insulation thickness calculations under different insulation
materials. Minimum optimum insulation thickness was calculated in case
XPS was preferred as insulation material, and the maximum one was
calculated in case of using glass wool. | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | In this study, five different cities were selected from the five climatic
zones according to Turkish standard TS 825, and insulation thicknesses of
exterior walls of sample buildings were calculated by using optimization.
Vertical perforated bricks with density of 550 kg/m3
and 1000
kg/m3werechosen within the study content. Glass wool, expanded
polystyrene (XPS), extruded polystyrene (EPS) were considered as
insulation materials. Additionally, natural gas, coal, fuel oil and LPG were
utilized as fuel for heating process while electricity was used for cooling.
Life cycle cost (LCC) analysis and degree-day method were the
approaches for optimum insulation thickness calculations. As a result, in
case of usage vertical perforated bricks with density of 550 kg/m3
and
1000 kg/m3
resulted different values in between 0.005-0.007 m (5-7 mm)
in the optimum insulation thickness calculations under different insulation
materials. Minimum optimum insulation thickness was calculated in case
XPS was preferred as insulation material, and the maximum one was
calculated in case of using glass wool. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | eng | en_US |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | en_US |
dc.subject | İstatistik ve Olasılık | en_US |
dc.subject | Matematik | en_US |
dc.subject | Uygulamalı | en_US |
dc.subject | Matematik | en_US |
dc.subject | Building Mass | en_US |
dc.subject | Optimization | en_US |
dc.subject | Thermal İnsulation | en_US |
dc.subject | Lifecycle Cost Analysis | en_US |
dc.subject | Degree-Day Method | en_US |
dc.title | Determination of optimum insulation thicknesses using economical analyse for exterior walls of buildings with different masses | en_US |
dc.type | article | en_US |
dc.relation.journal | An International Journal of Optimization and Control: Theories & Applications (IJOCTA) | en_US |
dc.contributor.department | Balıkesir Üniversitesi | en_US |
dc.identifier.volume | 7 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issue | 2 | en_US |
dc.identifier.startpage | 149 | en_US |
dc.identifier.endpage | 157 | en_US |
dc.relation.publicationcategory | Makale - Ulusal Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı | en_US |