Gelişmiş Arama

Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorKon, Okan
dc.date.accessioned2019-05-16T19:32:20Z
dc.date.available2019-05-16T19:32:20Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.issn2146-0957
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12462/3789
dc.description.abstractIn this study, five different cities were selected from the five climatic zones according to Turkish standard TS 825, and insulation thicknesses of exterior walls of sample buildings were calculated by using optimization. Vertical perforated bricks with density of 550 kg/m3 and 1000 kg/m3werechosen within the study content. Glass wool, expanded polystyrene (XPS), extruded polystyrene (EPS) were considered as insulation materials. Additionally, natural gas, coal, fuel oil and LPG were utilized as fuel for heating process while electricity was used for cooling. Life cycle cost (LCC) analysis and degree-day method were the approaches for optimum insulation thickness calculations. As a result, in case of usage vertical perforated bricks with density of 550 kg/m3 and 1000 kg/m3 resulted different values in between 0.005-0.007 m (5-7 mm) in the optimum insulation thickness calculations under different insulation materials. Minimum optimum insulation thickness was calculated in case XPS was preferred as insulation material, and the maximum one was calculated in case of using glass wool.en_US
dc.description.abstractIn this study, five different cities were selected from the five climatic zones according to Turkish standard TS 825, and insulation thicknesses of exterior walls of sample buildings were calculated by using optimization. Vertical perforated bricks with density of 550 kg/m3 and 1000 kg/m3werechosen within the study content. Glass wool, expanded polystyrene (XPS), extruded polystyrene (EPS) were considered as insulation materials. Additionally, natural gas, coal, fuel oil and LPG were utilized as fuel for heating process while electricity was used for cooling. Life cycle cost (LCC) analysis and degree-day method were the approaches for optimum insulation thickness calculations. As a result, in case of usage vertical perforated bricks with density of 550 kg/m3 and 1000 kg/m3 resulted different values in between 0.005-0.007 m (5-7 mm) in the optimum insulation thickness calculations under different insulation materials. Minimum optimum insulation thickness was calculated in case XPS was preferred as insulation material, and the maximum one was calculated in case of using glass wool.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectİstatistik ve Olasılıken_US
dc.subjectMatematiken_US
dc.subjectUygulamalıen_US
dc.subjectMatematiken_US
dc.subjectBuilding Massen_US
dc.subjectOptimizationen_US
dc.subjectThermal İnsulationen_US
dc.subjectLifecycle Cost Analysisen_US
dc.subjectDegree-Day Methoden_US
dc.titleDetermination of optimum insulation thicknesses using economical analyse for exterior walls of buildings with different massesen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.relation.journalAn International Journal of Optimization and Control: Theories & Applications (IJOCTA)en_US
dc.contributor.departmentBalıkesir Üniversitesien_US
dc.identifier.volume7en_US
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.startpage149en_US
dc.identifier.endpage157en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Ulusal Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Thumbnail

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster