dc.contributor.author | Dölçek, Ayşe Özdoğan | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-01-23T12:01:26Z | |
dc.date.available | 2024-01-23T12:01:26Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2022 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 1301-4048 / 2147-835X | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.16984/saufenbilder.962783 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12462/13825 | |
dc.description.abstract | Method of geocomposite drainage systems (GCDs) is relatively new and has been used as an
alternative drainage system for geotechnical applications. The advantages of this system are
cost- and time efficiency, environmentally sustainable, and at the same time, having comparable
or higher drainage capability compared to current practices. However, the geocomposite
materials, which are the main products of the GCD systems, need to meet certain criteria that
are required for the sufficient drainage systems. These criteria are mainly related to their
hydraulic and mechanical parameters that control the drainage capacity and durability of the
systems during/after the construction. In this study, laboratory testing and evaluation of five
different commercially available geocomposite products are conducted to improve the
understanding of their physical, hydraulic and mechanical properties. Physical properties are
defined by measuring their thicknesses and apparent opening sizes. Hydraulic parameters;
permittivity (volumetric flow rate of water in normal direction) under various hydraulic head
was measured using a constant-head equipment. Additional transmissivity and flow rate are
defined under various hydraulic gradient and normal compressive stresses using in-plane flow
rate testing apparatus. A number of strength testing; compressive strength, grab tensile strength,
elongations, trapezoidal and puncture strength are conducted to evaluate the mechanical
behavior of the geocomposite products. Results show that the parameters defined for each
product are in the same order of magnitude in corresponding testing program, yet some
differences are observed when compared with the manufacturer values. The reason of
differences and recommendations on the selection of standard testing methods are discussed.
Use of a factor of safety (FS) was suggested in the design of geocomposite drainage system
when selecting the geocomposite materials. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | eng | en_US |
dc.publisher | Sakarya Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü | en_US |
dc.relation.isversionof | 10.16984/saufenbilder.962783 | en_US |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | en_US |
dc.subject | Geocomposite Drain Materials | en_US |
dc.subject | Gecomposite Drainage Systems (GCDs) | en_US |
dc.subject | Earth Retaining Structures | en_US |
dc.subject | Geotextile | en_US |
dc.title | Laboratory experiments on performance evaluation of geocomposite drainage materials | en_US |
dc.type | article | en_US |
dc.relation.journal | Sakarya Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi | en_US |
dc.contributor.department | Mühendislik Fakültesi | en_US |
dc.contributor.authorID | 0000-0001-9740-2273 | en_US |
dc.identifier.volume | 26 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issue | 1 | en_US |
dc.identifier.startpage | 38 | en_US |
dc.identifier.endpage | 53 | en_US |
dc.relation.publicationcategory | Makale - Ulusal Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı | en_US |