EFFECT OF DIFFERENT SEMEN EXTENDERS ON CAT EPIDIDYMAL SEMEN CRYOPRESERVATION

dc.authoridPOLAT, EREN/0000-0002-3999-1310
dc.contributor.authorAcisu, Tutku Can
dc.contributor.authorAkarsu, Serkan Ali
dc.contributor.authorPolat, Eren
dc.contributor.authorBaykalir, Yasin
dc.contributor.authorOtlu, Onder
dc.contributor.authorCihangirogluf, Aslihan Cakir
dc.contributor.authorBadilli, Nida
dc.date.accessioned2025-07-03T21:25:06Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.departmentBalıkesir Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Cryopreservation of spermatozoa is a biotechnology used for fertilization purposes and preservation of genetic material in various domestic species. OBJECTIVE: To determine the efficacy of two different commercial semen diluents in the cryopreservation of epididymal semen of domestic cats. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty male cats aged between 1 - 3 years and weighing 2.5 - 4.5 kg were used in the study. The testicular tissues removed from the cats were immediately brought to the laboratory in physiological saline and the epididymal parts were trimmed in commercial semen extenders (INRA 96, Group I; OPTIXCELL, Group II). Diluted semen samples were cooled to 4 degrees C and filled into 0.25 mL straws. Semen samples were frozen in a programmable semen freezing device and then placed in a liquid nitrogen container at -196 C. Semen samples were thawed at 38 degrees C for 25 s. Thawed semen samples were evaluated in terms of motility and kinematic parameters using CASA. RESULTS: No statistical difference was found between the groups in terms of total motility, progressive motility, and velocity parameters at 4 degrees C. The rate of spermatozoa at slow speeds was found to be lower in group II. In addition, after freezing and thawing process, no statistical difference was observed between the groups in terms of motility, kinematics, and velocity parameters. CONCLUSION: Both commercial semen extenders can be used for cryopreservation of cat epididymal
dc.identifier.doi10.54680/fr24610110712
dc.identifier.endpage360
dc.identifier.issn0143-2044
dc.identifier.issn1742-0644
dc.identifier.issue6
dc.identifier.pmid40089821
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85209538328
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ3
dc.identifier.startpage355
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.54680/fr24610110712
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12462/21368
dc.identifier.volume45
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001416189700005
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ3
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherCryo Letters
dc.relation.ispartofCryoletters
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.snmzKA_WOS_20250703
dc.subjectcat
dc.subjectcryopreservation
dc.subjectepididymis
dc.subjectsemen extender
dc.subjectsperm.
dc.titleEFFECT OF DIFFERENT SEMEN EXTENDERS ON CAT EPIDIDYMAL SEMEN CRYOPRESERVATION
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar