Two-phase, two-stage, and single-stage anaerobic process comparison

dc.contributor.authorAzbar, Nuri
dc.contributor.authorSpeece, R.E.
dc.date.accessioned2019-09-03T06:14:49Z
dc.date.available2019-09-03T06:14:49Z
dc.date.issued2001en_US
dc.departmentFakülteler, Mühendislik Fakültesi, Çevre Mühendisliği Bölümüen_US
dc.descriptionAzbar, Nuri (Balikesir Author)en_US
dc.description.abstractIn this research, three anaerobic process configurations-namely, two-phase dual sludge (TPDS), two-stage single sludge (TSSS), and single-stage-were evaluated for effluent COD concentration. The same temperature, SRT, and glucose substrate were used in all experiments. In every case, TPDS and TSSS configurations significantly outperformed the single stage. All experiments were carried out at a temperature of 35 degreesC, end all reactors were operated as daily fill-and-draw with HRT = SRT. The following ranges for each design parameter were studied: pH (4.5, 5.5, and 6.5); first stage HRT (3, 8, and 24 h); and flee load (3, 9, and 27 gCOD/gVSS). The overall HRT/SRT of all systems was 30 days, and a pH-Stat system was used to control the pH in the acidification reactors at the desired value. Statistical evaluation of the results indicated that a flee load of 3 in the first reactor of TPDS yielded the lowest effluent COD concentrations under the studied range of parameters, while fur the TSSS reactor configuration the staging of the system itself was the controlling phenomena responsible for reduced effluent GOD.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(2001)127:3(240)
dc.identifier.endpage248en_US
dc.identifier.issn0733-9372
dc.identifier.issn1943-7870
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-0035282533
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2
dc.identifier.startpage240en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(2001)127:3(240)
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12462/6195
dc.identifier.volume127en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000167188500008
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ1
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherAsce-Amer Soc Civil Engineersen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Environmental Engineeringen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectFluidized-Bed Reactorsen_US
dc.subjectWaste-Water Treatmenten_US
dc.subjectDigestionen_US
dc.subjectSeparationen_US
dc.subjectGlucoseen_US
dc.subjectStabilizationen_US
dc.subjectDegradationen_US
dc.subjectHydrolysisen_US
dc.subjectEfficiencyen_US
dc.subjectGelatinen_US
dc.titleTwo-phase, two-stage, and single-stage anaerobic process comparisonen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket

Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Yükleniyor...
Küçük Resim
İsim:
nurı-azbar.pdf
Boyut:
219.96 KB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Açıklama:
Tam Metin / Full Text

Lisans paketi

Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Yükleniyor...
Küçük Resim
İsim:
license.txt
Boyut:
1.44 KB
Biçim:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Açıklama: