Ceftaroline plus Rifampin Versus Vancomycin plus Rifampin in the Treatment of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Meningitis in an Experimental Rabbit Model

dc.authoriduyanikgil, Yigit/0000-0002-4016-0522
dc.contributor.authorAkdag, Damla
dc.contributor.authorTurhan, Tuncer
dc.contributor.authorBolat, Elif
dc.contributor.authorSanlidag-Isbilen, Gamze
dc.contributor.authorTomruk, Canberk
dc.contributor.authorIsbilen, Furkan
dc.contributor.authorUyanikgil, Yigit
dc.date.accessioned2025-07-03T21:26:25Z
dc.date.issued2025
dc.departmentBalıkesir Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractBackground/Aim: To compare the effectiveness ceftaroline-rifampicin (CR) and vancomycin-rifampicin (VR), against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in a rabbit meningitis model, to compare the effects on brain tissues in terms of inflammation and apoptosis and to test the antibiotics via in vitro time-kill and synergy tests.Method: Meningitis was induced using MRSA strain ATCC 43300. After 28 hours, the rabbits were split into three groups: control, VR, and CR. A CSF culture was taken at the start (T0) and end of treatment (EOT)-the 24th hour of treatment. At EOT, the animals' brain tissues were examined for inflammation and apoptosis. The study strain was tested for a 24-hour time kill assay.Results: At the EOT, statistically significant differences were observed between the treatment groups in terms of reducing the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) bacterial count, achieving partial or complete treatment response, and exhibiting lower levels of neuronal apoptosis compared with the control group. However, there was no significant difference in all three parameters and in survival between the two treatment groups. The CR group exhibited a noticeable decrease in inflammation than the control group, but no significant difference was found between the control group versus VR and VR versus CR group. Rifampicin did not improve antibacterial efficacy in the in vitro time-kill assay.Conclusion: The CR arm showed better complete response and inflammation, but both treatments were similar in other parameters. CR combination was found as effective as VR combination for treating MRSA meningitis.
dc.description.sponsorshipEge University Scientific Research Foundation Coordination Unit [20680]
dc.description.sponsorshipEge University Scientific Research Foundation Coordination Unit (project id: 20680) provided funding for this study. The funders had no influence on study design, data collection, inter- pretation, or publication.
dc.identifier.doi10.1089/sur.2024.069
dc.identifier.issn1096-2964
dc.identifier.issn1557-8674
dc.identifier.pmid40103535
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-105000240285
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1089/sur.2024.069
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12462/21713
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001449352500001
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/A
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherMary Ann Liebert, Inc
dc.relation.ispartofSurgical Infections
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.snmzKA_WOS_20250703
dc.subjectanimal model
dc.subjectceftaroline
dc.subjectmethicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus
dc.subjectnosocomial meningitis
dc.subjectrifampin
dc.subjectvancomycin
dc.titleCeftaroline plus Rifampin Versus Vancomycin plus Rifampin in the Treatment of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Meningitis in an Experimental Rabbit Model
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar