Testing of support tools for plagiarism detection

dc.authorid0000-0002-7335-6548en_US
dc.authorid0000-0003-3150-9363en_US
dc.authorid0000-0002-0300-9073en_US
dc.authorid0000-0002-6316-3750en_US
dc.contributor.authorFoltynek, Tomas
dc.contributor.authorDlabolova, Dita
dc.contributor.authorAnohina-Naumeca, Alla
dc.contributor.authorRazi, Salim
dc.contributor.authorKravjar, Julius
dc.contributor.authorKamzola, Laima
dc.contributor.authorGuerrero-Dib, Jean
dc.contributor.authorÇelik, Özgür
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-17T07:23:08Z
dc.date.available2021-03-17T07:23:08Z
dc.date.issued2020en_US
dc.departmentYüksekokullar, Yabancı Diller Yüksekokulu, Yabancı Diller Bölümüen_US
dc.descriptionÇelik, Özgür (Balikesir Author)en_US
dc.description.abstractThere is a general belief that software must be able to easily do things that humans find difficult. Since finding sources for plagiarism in a text is not an easy task, there is a wide-spread expectation that it must be simple for software to determine if a text is plagiarized or not. Software cannot determine plagiarism, but it can work as a support tool for identifying some text similarity that may constitute plagiarism. But how well do the various systems work? This paper reports on a collaborative test of 15 web-based text-matching systems that can be used when plagiarism is suspected. It was conducted by researchers from seven countries using test material in eight different languages, evaluating the effectiveness of the systems on single-source and multi-source documents. A usability examination was also performed. The sobering results show that although some systems can indeed help identify some plagiarized content, they clearly do not find all plagiarism and at times also identify non-plagiarized material as problematic.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipHTW Berlinen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s41239-020-00192-4
dc.identifier.endpage31en_US
dc.identifier.issn2365-9440
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85088576086
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.startpage1en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-020-00192-4
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12462/11217
dc.identifier.volume17en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000552264700001
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ1
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSpringeren_US
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Educationen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectText-Matching Softwareen_US
dc.subjectSoftware Testingen_US
dc.subjectPlagiarismen_US
dc.subjectPlagiarism Detection Toolsen_US
dc.subjectUsability Testingen_US
dc.titleTesting of support tools for plagiarism detectionen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket

Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Yükleniyor...
Küçük Resim
İsim:
ozgur-celik3.pdf
Boyut:
2.41 MB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Açıklama:
Tam Metin / Full Text

Lisans paketi

Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Yükleniyor...
Küçük Resim
İsim:
license.txt
Boyut:
1.44 KB
Biçim:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Açıklama: