Comparison of agar-based and checkerboard methods to assess phage–antimicrobial synergy in pseudomonas aeruginosa

dc.authorid0000-0002-5793-5742
dc.authorid0000-0001-8023-2976
dc.authorid0000-0002-8571-7849
dc.contributor.authorYılmaz, Umut
dc.contributor.authorÜnlü, Mehmet
dc.contributor.authorÜnlü, Gülhan
dc.date.accessioned2026-06-22T08:10:18Z
dc.date.issued2026
dc.departmentFakülteler, Tıp Fakültesi, Temel Tıp Bilimleri Bölümü
dc.descriptionÜnlü, Gülhan (Balikesir Author) Ünlü, Mehmet (Balikesir Author)
dc.description.abstractMultidrug-resistant (MDR) Pseudomonas aeruginosa requires innovative therapeutic approaches. In this study, two lytic bacteriophages (BAUNPA1, BAUNPA3) were isolated from wastewater in Türkiye, and the combined efficacy of these phages with antibiotics (ciprofloxacin, colistin, meropenem, tobramycin) or antimicrobial peptides (murepavadin, pexiganan) was evaluated in vitro.Phages were characterized morphologically by elec tron microscopy and genotypically by restriction fragment length polymorphism, and their different identities were confirmed. Biological evaluation showed rapid replication (latent period: 30 min; burst sizes: 189 and 43 PFU/cell), lytic activity against clinical MDR isolates, and stability under physiological conditions (pH 6–8; temperature ≤ 50 ◦C). Synergy was assessed using modified double-layer agar and checkerboard assays under simultaneous and sequential applications. The checkerboard assay showed that synergy was significantly enhanced under phage-first application. BAUNPA1 showed strong synergy with meropenem (FICI ≤0.5) and colistin, while BAUNPA3 showed synergy with murepavadin and pexiganan. Agar-based methods have shown variable results, as plaque morphology does not always correlate quantitatively synergy. This study provides a comparative in vitro framework for assessing phage-antimicrobial interactions and, for the first time, reports reproducible synergy between intact lytic phages and murepavadin or pexiganan, highlighting the importance of methodological approach and application timing in synergy assessments.
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.mimet.2026.107441
dc.identifier.endpage11
dc.identifier.issn1872-8359
dc.identifier.pmid41759663
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-105031608981
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ3
dc.identifier.startpage1
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.mimet.2026.107441
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12462/24065
dc.identifier.volume243
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001710259500001
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherElsevier B.V.
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Microbiological Methods
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.subjectBacteriophage
dc.subjectAntibiotic
dc.subjectPeptide
dc.subjectSynergy
dc.subjectPseudomonas Aeruginosa
dc.titleComparison of agar-based and checkerboard methods to assess phage–antimicrobial synergy in pseudomonas aeruginosa
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket

Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Yükleniyor...
Küçük Resim
İsim:
unlu-mehmet.pdf
Boyut:
166.63 KB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Lisans paketi

Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Yükleniyor...
Küçük Resim
İsim:
license.txt
Boyut:
1.17 KB
Biçim:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Açıklama: