Which is worst in patients undergoing primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction? Hyperglycaemia? Diabetes mellitus? Or both?

dc.contributor.authorErgelen, Mehmet
dc.contributor.authorUyarel, Hüseyin
dc.contributor.authorÇicek, Gökhan
dc.contributor.authorIşık, Turgay
dc.contributor.authorOsmonov, Damirbek
dc.contributor.authorGünaydın, Zeki Yüksel
dc.contributor.authorBozbay, Mehmet
dc.contributor.authorTürer, Ayça
dc.date.accessioned2019-10-16T11:03:30Z
dc.date.available2019-10-16T11:03:30Z
dc.date.issued2010en_US
dc.departmentFakülteler, Tıp Fakültesi, Dahili Tıp Bilimleri Bölümüen_US
dc.descriptionUyarel, Hüseyin (Balikesir Author)en_US
dc.description.abstractObjective - The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of admission hyperglycaemia and/or diabetes mellitus (DM) on the outcomes of primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Methods - 2482 consecutive patients with STEMI (mean age 56.5 +/- 11.9, years, 2064 men) undergoing primary PCI between October 2003 and March 2008 were retrospectively enrolled into the present study. Hyperglycaemia was defined as a venous plasma glucose level >= 200 mg/dl on admission. Patients were classified into four groups: non-diabetic/non-hyperglycaemic (NDNH, n = 1806) patients; diabetic/non-hyperglycaemic (DNH, n = 271) patients; non-diabetic/hyperglycaemic (NDH, n = 64); and diabetic/hyperglycaemic (DH, n = 341). Results - In-hospital mortality was higher in NDH (12.5%) compared to DH (8.5%), DNH (6.3%), and NDNH (0.9%) patients (P < 0.001). The composite end points including death, reinfarction, and target-vessel revascularization (major adverse cardiac events [MACE]) in the hospital were also higher in NDH (18.8%) compared with other patients (DH, 13.8% vs. DNH, 10.3% vs. NDNH, 3.7%, P < 0.001). The median follow-up time was 21 months. The Kaplan-Meier survival plot for long-term cardiovascular death was worst for DH patients (log rank P < 0.001). After adjustment for potentially confounding factors, NDH (OR 3.04, 95% CI 1.06-8.73; P = 0.03), and DH (OR 2.3, 95% CI 1.29-4.09; P = 0.005), but not DNH (OR 1.22, 95% CI 0.57-2.6; P = 0.6) status, remained independent predictors of long-term cardiovascular mortality. Conclusions - STEMI patients with NDH represent the highest risk population for in-hospital mortality, and MACE. The worst outcomes for long-term cardiovascular mortality occur in DH patients.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.2143/AC.65.4.2053900
dc.identifier.endpage423en_US
dc.identifier.issn0001-5385
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-78049275798
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ3
dc.identifier.startpage415en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.2143/AC.65.4.2053900
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12462/6968
dc.identifier.volume65en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000281697100006
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherActa Cardiologicaen_US
dc.relation.ispartofActa Cardiologicaen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccessen_US
dc.subjectPrimary Angioplastyen_US
dc.subjectAcute Myocardial Infarctionen_US
dc.subjectHyperglycaemiaen_US
dc.subjectDiabetes Mellitusen_US
dc.subjectPrognosisen_US
dc.titleWhich is worst in patients undergoing primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction? Hyperglycaemia? Diabetes mellitus? Or both?en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket

Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Yükleniyor...
Küçük Resim
İsim:
hüseyin-uyarel.pdf
Boyut:
441.86 KB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Açıklama:
Tam Metin / Full Text

Lisans paketi

Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Yükleniyor...
Küçük Resim
İsim:
license.txt
Boyut:
1.44 KB
Biçim:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Açıklama: