The Impact of Ureteral Access Sheath Size on Perioperative Parameters and Postoperative Ureteral Stricture in Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery

dc.authoridTuncel, Altug/0000-0003-2482-797X
dc.authoridASLAN, YILMAZ/0000-0003-0670-6840
dc.authoridBalci, Melih/0000-0002-1506-941X
dc.contributor.authorAykanat, Can
dc.contributor.authorBalci, Melih
dc.contributor.authorSenel, Cagdas
dc.contributor.authorOzercan, Ali Yasin
dc.contributor.authorCoser, Seref
dc.contributor.authorAslan, Yilmaz
dc.contributor.authorGuzel, Ozer
dc.date.accessioned2025-07-03T21:26:25Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.departmentBalıkesir Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractObjective: To investigate the effect of the diameter of ureteral access sheath (UAS) used during retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) on operative parameters, perioperative ureteral injury, and ureteral stricture development.Materials and Methods: The study was designed as a prospective randomized controlled trial and included 320 patients who underwent RIRS. The patients were divided into two groups according to the diameter of UAS (9.5F/11.5F [Group 1] and 12F/14F [Group 2]) placed during the operation. At the end of the operation, ureteral injury was checked visually using semirigid ureterorenoscopy and classified according to the ureter injury scale. In the postoperative first year, the control CT urography images were used to observe newly developing ureteral dilatation.Results: There was no statistical difference between the two groups in terms of patient and stone characteristics, operative time, postoperative stone-free rate, and postoperative infection development parameters. In Group 1, 30 (18.8%) of the patients had low-grade and 8 (5%) of the patients had high-grade ureteral injury, while in Group 2, 44 (27.5%) had low-grade and 19 (11.9%) had high-grade ureteral injury (p = 0.013). In the postoperative period, ureteral stricture was found in 5 (1.6%) patients, of whom 4 (2.5%) were in Group 2 and 1 (0.6%) (p = 0.371).Conclusion: The results of our study showed that the use of a 12F/14F UAS in patients who are not previously stented increases the risk of high-grade ureteral injuries; however, despite this increase there is no difference in ureteral stricture formation.
dc.identifier.doi10.1089/end.2021.0751
dc.identifier.endpage1017
dc.identifier.issn0892-7790
dc.identifier.issn1557-900X
dc.identifier.issue8
dc.identifier.pmid35229631
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85128826275
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.startpage1013
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1089/end.2021.0751
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12462/21714
dc.identifier.volume36
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000776443300001
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ2
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherMary Ann Liebert, Inc
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Endourology
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.snmzKA_WOS_20250703
dc.subjectureteral access sheath
dc.subjectretrograde intrarenal surgery
dc.subjectureteral stricture
dc.subjectkidney stone
dc.titleThe Impact of Ureteral Access Sheath Size on Perioperative Parameters and Postoperative Ureteral Stricture in Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar