Effects of different inactivation and activation treatments applied to lactic acid bacteria on AFM1 detoxification in milk

dc.contributor.authorGuner, Tevhide Elif
dc.contributor.authorAkyol, Busra Aslan
dc.contributor.authorTavsanli, Hakan
dc.contributor.authorGokbulut, Cengiz
dc.date.accessioned2025-07-03T21:26:40Z
dc.date.issued2025
dc.departmentBalıkesir Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractAflatoxins are significant contaminants that pose a threat to human and animal health due to their toxic effects and also lead to substantial economic losses. One effective strategy to mitigate their impact is to reduce their bioavailability by promoting their binding during digestion or absorption. This study aimed to evaluate the AFM(1) binding efficiency of lactic acid bacteria (Lactobacillus acidophilus, Limosilactobacillus reuteri, Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus, and their combination) under different activation (ultrasound) and inactivation (heat, acid, and ultrasound) treatments in an UHT skim milk matrix. All treatment groups exhibited statistically significant AFM(1) binding compared to the controls (p < 0.05). In the UHT skim milk matrix, the binding rates in the ultrasound treated groups (34 %-43.5 %) were found to be significantly higher compared to both the groups treated with ultrasound in the phosphate buffered saline matrix and those treated with live, heat, or acid inactivated bacteria (16.5 %-28 %) (p < 0.05). Among the groups treated with ultrasound in the milk matrix, the highest binding rate was observed in the group treated with ultrasound inactivated L. rhamnosus (43.5 %), while the lowest was recorded in the ultrasound activated combined group (34 %) (p < 0.05). A significant difference was also observed between the live (28 %) and heat inactivated (16.5 %) L. reuteri groups (p < 0.05). This study demonstrated that ultrasound treatment in UHT skim milk is more effective than other methods in enhancing the AFM(1) binding capacity. The results indicate that probiotic bacteria can be utilized for AFM(1) detoxification through various activation and inactivation strategies.
dc.description.sponsorshipBalimath;kesir University Scientific Research Projects Coordination Unit [2023/104]
dc.description.sponsorshipThis work was supported by Bal & imath;kesir University Scientific Research Projects Coordination Unit with a project number 2023/104.
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.fbio.2025.106974
dc.identifier.issn2212-4292
dc.identifier.issn2212-4306
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-105007350593
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.fbio.2025.106974
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12462/21837
dc.identifier.volume69
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001507988100001
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/A
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherElsevier
dc.relation.ispartofFood Bioscience
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.snmzKA_WOS_20250703
dc.subjectDetoxification
dc.subjectLactic acid bacteria
dc.subjectUltrasound
dc.subjectAflatoxin M-1
dc.titleEffects of different inactivation and activation treatments applied to lactic acid bacteria on AFM1 detoxification in milk
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar