Comparison of the Radiological and Functional Results of Tight Rope and Clavicular Hook Plate Technique in the Treatment of Acute Acromioclavicular Joint Dislocation

dc.authoridaydogmus, huseyin/0000-0001-5231-1941
dc.contributor.authorGultac, Emre
dc.contributor.authorCan, Fatih Ilker
dc.contributor.authorKilinc, Cem Yalin
dc.contributor.authorAydogmus, Huseyin
dc.contributor.authorTopsakal, Fatih Emre
dc.contributor.authorAcan, Ahmet Emrah
dc.contributor.authorAydogan, Nevres Hurriyet
dc.date.accessioned2025-07-03T21:26:27Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.departmentBalıkesir Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractPurpose/Aim Options for surgery for acromioclavicular (AC) joint dislocation vary considerably. This study aimed to examine the functional and radiological results of patients who were operated on using the tightrope (TR) or clavicular hook plate (CHP) technique in the treatment for AC joint dislocation. Materials and methods: The data gathered from 35 consecutive patients who were operated on for AC joint dislocation were analyzed retrospectively in terms of their radiological and functional outcomes. Results: Thirty-two (91.4%) of the 35 patients were male and 3 (8.6%) were female. Thirty (85.7%) patients were classified as Rockwood type 3 and 5 (14.3%) as type 5. Twenty-one patients operated on using the TR technique were categorized as group 1, and 14 patients treated with the CHP technique formed group 2. Functional results were evaluated using the Constant-Murley shoulder scoring system; no statistically significant difference was observed between type 3 and 5 AC separation (p = 0.337). The mean Constant scores of type 3 and 5 injuries were 82.96 and 88.6, respectively. A significant relationship was noted between reduction quality and functional scores (p = 0.006). Postoperative osteoarthritis was seen in 12 (57.14%) patients in group 1 and 7 (50.00%) patients in group 2. In terms of surgery duration, 50.57 minutes in group 1 and 35.71 minutes in group 2 were noted. A statistically significant difference was found between the two groups in terms of surgery duration (p < 0.05). Conclusions: TR and CHP techniques, which do not differ significantly in terms of their clinical results, can be used safely in the treatment of AC separation.
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/08941939.2021.1897196
dc.identifier.endpage696
dc.identifier.issn0894-1939
dc.identifier.issn1521-0553
dc.identifier.issue3
dc.identifier.pmid33691574
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85102577606
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.startpage693
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1080/08941939.2021.1897196
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12462/21744
dc.identifier.volume35
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000627606100001
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ3
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherTaylor & Francis Inc
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Investigative Surgery
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.snmzKA_WOS_20250703
dc.subjectAcromioclavicular joint dislocation
dc.subjectclavicular hook plate
dc.subjecttightrope
dc.subjectfunctional results
dc.subjectradiological results
dc.subjectsurgical treatment
dc.titleComparison of the Radiological and Functional Results of Tight Rope and Clavicular Hook Plate Technique in the Treatment of Acute Acromioclavicular Joint Dislocation
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar