Primary percutaneous coronary intervention in patients admitted with cardiogenic shock and ST-elevation myocardial infarction: prognosis and predictors of in-hospital mortality

dc.authoriduyarel, huseyin/0000-0001-9931-5456
dc.authoridDemirci, Deniz/0000-0002-1571-7034
dc.authoridErgelen, Mehmet/0009-0007-1559-5480
dc.contributor.authorErgelen, Mehmet
dc.contributor.authorUyarel, Huseyin
dc.contributor.authorAkkaya, Emre
dc.contributor.authorYildirim, Ersin
dc.contributor.authorErsan, Duygu
dc.contributor.authorDemirci, Deniz
dc.contributor.authorTurkkan, Ceyhan
dc.date.accessioned2025-07-03T21:27:10Z
dc.date.issued2010
dc.departmentBalıkesir Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractObjectives: We investigated the efficacy and outcome of primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients admitted with cardiogenic shock and ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Study design: We reviewed 91 consecutive patients (66 males, 25 females; mean age 61 +/- 11 years) treated with primary PCI for cardiogenic shock due to STEMI. All clinical, angiographic data, and in-hospital and long-term outcomes were collected. The patients were classified into two groups depending on the presence (n=59, 64.8%) or absence (n=32, 35.2%) of in-hospital mortality. Results: Hospital nonsurvivors were older (mean age 62.7 +/- 11.1 vs. 57.7 +/- 11.4 years; p=0.04) and exhibited higher frequencies of diabetes mellitus (DM), renal failure, and history of myocardial infarction. Multi-vessel disease (p=0.004) and circumflex artery involvement (p=0.03) were more frequent and the rates of tirofiban administration (p=0.02) and stenting (p=0.007) were lower in nonsurvivors. Procedural success rate was substantially lower in nonsurvivors (39% vs. 84.4%; p<0.001). Of 32 survivors, cardiovascular mortality occurred in only three patients (9.4%) during a median follow-up of 26 months. In multivariate regression analysis, unsuccessful procedure (OR 7.2, 95% CI 1.77-29.27; p=0.006) and DM (OR 3.92, 95% CI 1.13-13.62; p=0.03) were the independent predictors of in-hospital mortality. Conclusion: Mortality rate is considerably higher and successful procedure yields a two-fold decrease in in-hospital mortality in patients with cardiogenic shock complicated by STEMI. Unsuccessful procedure and DM represent as two independent predictors of in-hospital mortality.
dc.identifier.endpage256
dc.identifier.issn1016-5169
dc.identifier.issue4
dc.identifier.pmid20935431
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ3
dc.identifier.startpage250
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12462/22077
dc.identifier.volume38
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000421499200004
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/A
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherTurkish Soc Cardiology
dc.relation.ispartofTurk Kardiyoloji Dernegi Arsivi-Archives of the Turkish Society of Cardiology
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.snmzKA_WOS_20250703
dc.subjectAngioplasty
dc.subjecttransluminal
dc.subjectpercutaneous coronary
dc.subjecthospital mortality
dc.subjectmyocardial infarction/therapy/complications
dc.subjectprognosis
dc.subjectshock
dc.subjectcardiogenic/therapy/mortality
dc.subjectstents
dc.titlePrimary percutaneous coronary intervention in patients admitted with cardiogenic shock and ST-elevation myocardial infarction: prognosis and predictors of in-hospital mortality
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar