Exploring the potential of multi-hydrological model weighting schemes to reduce uncertainty in runoff projections

dc.authorid0000-0001-8362-5767
dc.authorid0000-0002-9483-1563
dc.authorid0000-0003-1284-3825
dc.contributor.authorErsoy, Zeynep Beril
dc.contributor.authorFıstıkoğlu, Okan
dc.contributor.authorOkkan, Umut
dc.date.accessioned2026-03-18T05:52:13Z
dc.date.issued2025
dc.departmentFakülteler, Mühendislik Fakültesi, İnşaat Mühendisliği Bölümü
dc.descriptionOkkan, Umut (Balikesir Author) Ersoy, Zeynep Beril (Balikesir Author)
dc.description.abstractWhile weighted multi-model approaches are widely used to improve predictive capability, hydrological models (HMs) and their weighted combinations that perform well under past conditions may not guarantee robustness under future climate scenarios. Furthermore, the extent to which weighting schemes influence the propagation of runoff projection uncertainty remains insufficiently explored. Therefore, this study evaluates the capacity of strategies that weight monthly scale HMs to narrow runoff projection uncertainty. Since standard approaches rely only on historical simulation skill and offer static weighting, this study introduces a refined framework, the Uncertainty Optimizing Multi-Model Ensemble (UO-MME), which dynamically considers the trade-offs between calibration performance and projection uncertainty. In performing the uncertainty decomposition, a total of 140 ensemble runoff projections, generated through a modelling chain comprising five GCMs, two emission scenarios, two downscaling methods, and seven HMs, were analyzed for Beydag and Tahtali watersheds in Türkiye. Results indicate that standard techniques, such as Bayesian model averaging, ordered weighted averaging, and Granger–Ramanathan averaging, led to either marginal reductions or noticeable increases in projection uncertainty, depending on the case and projection period. Conversely, the UO-MME achieved average reductions in projection uncertainty of around 30% across the two watersheds by balancing the influences of climate signals produced by GCMs that are reflected in the projections through HMs while maintaining high simulation accuracy, as indicated by Nash–Sutcliffe efficiency values exceeding 0.75. Although not designed to eliminate inherently irreducible uncertainty, the UO-MME framework helps temper the inflation of noisy GCM signals in runoff responses, providing more balanced hydrological projections for water resources planning
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/w17202919
dc.identifier.endpage29
dc.identifier.issn2073-4441
dc.identifier.issue20
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-105020012516
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.startpage1
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.3390/w17202919
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12462/23536
dc.identifier.volume17
dc.identifier.wos001602244000001
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ2
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherMDPI
dc.relation.ispartofWater
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectWeighted Multi-Model Approaches
dc.subjectClimate Change Scenarios
dc.subjectUncertainty
dc.subjectOptimizing Multi-Model Ensemble
dc.subjectProjection Uncertainty
dc.titleExploring the potential of multi-hydrological model weighting schemes to reduce uncertainty in runoff projections
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket

Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Yükleniyor...
Küçük Resim
İsim:
ersoy-zeynep beril.pdf
Boyut:
4.43 MB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Lisans paketi

Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Yükleniyor...
Küçük Resim
İsim:
license.txt
Boyut:
1.17 KB
Biçim:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Açıklama: