Intradermal skin testing in allergic rhinitis and asthma with negative skin prick tests

dc.authorid0000-0002-5332-5234en_US
dc.authorid0000-0002-5050-5694en_US
dc.authorid0000-0002-5180-9649en_US
dc.contributor.authorErel, Fuat
dc.contributor.authorSarıoğlu, Nurhan
dc.contributor.authorKöse, Mehmet
dc.contributor.authorKaymakçı, Mustafa
dc.contributor.authorGökçen, Mücahide
dc.contributor.authorKepekci, Ahmet Hamdi
dc.contributor.authorArslan, Mehmet
dc.date.accessioned2019-09-24T07:41:01Z
dc.date.available2019-09-24T07:41:01Z
dc.date.issued2017en_US
dc.departmentFakülteler, Tıp Fakültesi, Dahili Tıp Bilimleri Bölümüen_US
dc.descriptionErel, Fuat (Balikesir Author)en_US
dc.description.abstract"Taking medical history, physical examination, and performing some in vivo and in vitro tests are necessary for the diagnosis of allergy. Skin prick test (SPT) is considered as the standard method and first-line approach for the detection of allergic sensitization. Although mainly SPT is used for the detection of allergic sensitization, intradermal skin test (IDST) may be necessary, especially in patients with a negative SPT result. IDST is quite safe; however, is nowadays seldom used for detection of inhalant allergy and its value remains controversial. We aimed to investigate whether IDST is useful and necessary in diagnosis of respiratory allergies or not. This study involved 4223 patients with allergic rhinitis (AR) and/or bronchial asthma (BA). SPT results were positive in 2419 patients (57%) and negative in 1804 (43%). IDST was applied to 344 patients with marked allergic symptoms and with negative SPT results. Out of 344 patients, 152 (44%) showed allergic sensitization to IDST. The most commonly encountered allergic response was against the house dust mite (HDM) (32.6%). Allergic response against fungal spores was also relatively high (22%), while the pollen allergy rate (4.3%) was quite low. In BA patients with negative prick test, IDST made a significant contribution to the diagnosis of HDM allergy (p=0.003). To avoid missed diagnosis of AR and BA, particularly regarding the HDM allergy, application of IDST may be beneficial; therefore, IDST should be considered as the next step after SPT for diagnosis of allergy prior to in vitro or provocation tests."en_US
dc.identifier.endpage197en_US
dc.identifier.issn1735-1502
dc.identifier.issn1735-5249
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85021175015
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ3
dc.identifier.startpage193en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12462/6453
dc.identifier.volume16en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000406133200003
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherIranian Scientific Society Medical Entomologyen_US
dc.relation.ispartofIranian Journal of Allergy Asthma and Immunologyen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectAeroallergenen_US
dc.subjectAllergicen_US
dc.subjectAsthmaen_US
dc.subjectFungalen_US
dc.subjectIntradermalen_US
dc.subjectMiteen_US
dc.subjectPollenen_US
dc.subjectPricken_US
dc.subjectRhinitisen_US
dc.subjectSkin testen_US
dc.titleIntradermal skin testing in allergic rhinitis and asthma with negative skin prick testsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket

Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Yükleniyor...
Küçük Resim
İsim:
fuat-erel.pdf
Boyut:
328.07 KB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Açıklama:
Tam Metin / Full Text

Lisans paketi

Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Yükleniyor...
Küçük Resim
İsim:
license.txt
Boyut:
1.44 KB
Biçim:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Açıklama: