Effects of different housing systems on some performance trats and egg qualities of laying hens

dc.authorid0000-0002-1896-2449
dc.authorid0000-0001-5331-0596
dc.authorid0000-0001-7784-9115
dc.authorid0000-0002-7661-2172
dc.authorid0000-0002-1610-8476
dc.authorid0000-0003-3697-8804
dc.contributor.authorŞekeroğlu, Ahmet
dc.contributor.authorSarıca, Musa
dc.contributor.authorDemir, Ergün
dc.contributor.authorUlutaş, Zafer
dc.contributor.authorTilki, Muammer
dc.contributor.authorSaatçi, Mustafa
dc.contributor.authorOmed, Hussain
dc.date.accessioned2026-02-12T10:17:10Z
dc.date.issued2010
dc.departmentMeslek Yüksekokulları, Bandırma Meslek Yüksekokulu
dc.descriptionDemir, Ergün (Balikesir Author)
dc.description.abstractThis research was carried out to investigate the effects of husbandry systems (deep litter, free range and cage systems) on brown layer strain of ATAK (G(x)S(x)) in terms of egg production and egg quality. In the experiment, deep litter and free range systems were replicated four times with 20 birds per replication and the cage system was replicated six times with 16 birds per replicate. Water and feed were supplied ad libitum to the birds in the experiment. In deep litter, free range and cage systems, respectively: 50% production age was 168.75, 160.00 and 158.33 days (p>0.05); feed intake (g/bird/day) was 157.21, 146.70 and 134.33 (p<0.01); bird weights at 5% egg yield were 1732.07, 1697.27 and 1775.05 g (p<0.01); hen housed egg production was 96.44, 118.08 and 111.00 eggs (p>0.05); egg shape index was 76.46, 76.05 and 77.27% (p<0.01); egg shell colour (L-a-b) was 25.28, 23.80 and 22.56 (p<0.05); egg albumen pH values were 8.79, 8.72 and 8.72 (p<0.01); cracked egg ratio was 2.66, 2.02 and 3.13% (p>0.05). The free-range system had some advantages when compared to deep litter and cage systems in terms of 5% yield age weight, hen housed egg yield, egg shape index and cracked egg ratio. However, as a result of the study, it has been determined that there were no great differences among deep litter, free-range and cage systems. More detailed studies are necessary to show the differences and advantages of the main poultry housing systems.
dc.identifier.doi10.3923/javaa.2010.1739.1744
dc.identifier.endpage1744
dc.identifier.issn1680-5593
dc.identifier.issue9
dc.identifier.startpage1739
dc.identifier.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.3923/javaa.2010.1739.1744
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12462/22911
dc.identifier.volume12
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherMedwell Online
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Animal and Veterinary Advances
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectHousing Systems
dc.subjectDeep Litter
dc.subjectFree Range
dc.subjectCage
dc.subjectEgg Quality
dc.subjectBirds
dc.subjectWhıte Leghorn
dc.subjectSalmonella
dc.subjectEnterıtıdıs
dc.titleEffects of different housing systems on some performance trats and egg qualities of laying hens
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket

Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Yükleniyor...
Küçük Resim
İsim:
demir- ergün.pdf
Boyut:
423.9 KB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Lisans paketi

Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Yükleniyor...
Küçük Resim
İsim:
license.txt
Boyut:
1.17 KB
Biçim:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Açıklama: