Gelişmiş Arama

Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorSağır, Özlem
dc.contributor.authorNoyan, Funda Yücesoy
dc.contributor.authorKöroğlu, Ahmet
dc.contributor.authorÇiçek, Müslüm
dc.contributor.authorToprak, Hüseyin İlksen
dc.date.accessioned2019-10-25T08:24:07Z
dc.date.available2019-10-25T08:24:07Z
dc.date.issued2013en_US
dc.identifier.issn22287523
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12462/9265
dc.descriptionSağır, Özlem (Balikesir Author)en_US
dc.description.abstractBackground: Postoperative residual blockade, longer duration of action for neuromuscular blockade, and slower recovery were relatively common in elderly patients. Objectives: We aimed to investigate the safety of train-of-four ratio and clinical tests in the assessment of patient recovery, and to determine the effects of the rocuronium, vecuronium, and cisatracurium on intubation, extubation and recovery times in elderly patients undergoing abdominal surgery. Patients and Methods: After obtaining institutional approval and informed consent, 60 patients over 60 years old and undergoing elective abdominal operations were included in this double-blind, randomized clinical trial. Following a standard anesthesia induction, 0.6mg kg-1 rocuronium, 0.1mg kg-1 vecuronium, and 0.1mg kg-1 cisatracurium were administered to the patients in Group R, Group V, and Group C, respectively. Train-of-four (TOF) ratios were recorded at 10-minute intervals during and after the operation. Modified Aldrete Score (MAS) and clinical tests were recorded in the recovery room at 10-minute intervals. In addition, intubation and extubation times, duration of recovery room stay, and any complications were recorded. Results: Intubation time was found to be shorter in Group R than that in Groups V and C (P < 0.001). Times to positive visual disturbances and grip strength tests were shorter in Group C than that in Group V (P = 0.016 and P = 0.011, respectively). In Group R and group C, time to TOF ≥ 0.9 was significantly longer than all positive clinical test times except grip strength (P < 0.05). Conclusions: We hold the opinion that cisatracurium is safer in elderly patients compared to other drugs. We also concluded that the usage of TOF ratio together with clinical tests is suitable for assessment of neuromuscular recovery in these patients.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherKowsar Medical Publishing Companyen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.5812/aapm.8406en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectAgeden_US
dc.subjectCisatracuriumen_US
dc.subjectNeuromuscular blockadeen_US
dc.subjectRocuroniumen_US
dc.subjectVecuronium Bromideen_US
dc.titleComparison between the effects of rocuronium, vecuronium, and cisatracurium using train-of-four and clinical tests in elderly patientsen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.relation.journalAnesthesiology and Pain Medicineen_US
dc.contributor.departmentTıp Fakültesien_US
dc.identifier.volume2en_US
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.startpage142en_US
dc.identifier.endpage148en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Ulusal Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Thumbnail

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster