dc.date.accessioned | 2019-10-17T11:57:11Z | |
dc.date.available | 2019-10-17T11:57:11Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2016 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 1556-7249 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1556-7257 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.1080/15567249.2011.633595 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12462/8825 | |
dc.description | Çetintaş, Hakan (Balikesir Author) | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | This study investigates the causality relationship between energy consumption and economic growth in 17 transition countries, which are Albania, Armenia, Belarus, Bulgaria, Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyz Republic, Latvia, Moldova, Poland, Romania, Russian Federation, Slovenia, Ukraine, and Georgia. Empirical findings indicate that there is unidirectional causality from economic growth to energy consumption in the long run. The results support for conservation hypothesis suggests that energy conservation policies have no effect on economic growth. They can simultaneously achieve policy goals concerning growth and energy. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | eng | en_US |
dc.publisher | Taylor & Franlis Ltd | en_US |
dc.relation.isversionof | 10.1080/15567249.2011.633595 | en_US |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | en_US |
dc.subject | Causality | en_US |
dc.subject | Cointegration | en_US |
dc.subject | Energy Consumption | en_US |
dc.subject | Growthx | en_US |
dc.subject | Growth | en_US |
dc.subject | Unit Root | en_US |
dc.title | Energy consumption and economic growth: The case of transition economies | en_US |
dc.type | article | en_US |
dc.relation.journal | Energy Sources Part B-Economics Planning And Policy | en_US |
dc.contributor.department | İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi | en_US |
dc.identifier.volume | 11 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issue | 3 | en_US |
dc.identifier.startpage | 267 | en_US |
dc.identifier.endpage | 273 | en_US |
dc.relation.publicationcategory | Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı | en_US |