Gelişmiş Arama

Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorBilgic, Emine Nur Ünveren
dc.contributor.authorÜzel, Devrim
dc.date.accessioned2019-10-17T11:36:18Z
dc.date.available2019-10-17T11:36:18Z
dc.date.issued2014en_US
dc.identifier.issn1877-0428
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.349
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12462/8616
dc.descriptionÜzel, Devrim (Balikesir Author)en_US
dc.description.abstractThe need of using and understanding mathematics is gaining importance in daily life and this importance is growing gradually. The most important goal of mathematics education is to obtain logical answers in response to questions 'why?' and 'how?'; in other words, the goal is to ensure the development of reasoning. It is observed in this study that whether there are any changes in the attitudes of the candidates towards proof and proofs based on mathematical modeling. This study consists of two parts which are to test pre-post attitudes. 60 students who are in their third year of BA education attended to this search. They are enrolled in Balikesir University Necatibey Education Faculty Elementary Mathematics Education in 2010-2011 Spring Term. Intentional sampling is used in selecting the sample. 'Attitude Scale to Proof', developed by Uzel and Ozdemir (2009)- five point Likert Scale-is used to explore the attitudes of the candidates. This scale Cronbach Alpha coefficient is found .897. The item-total correlations were between .50 - .82. The data is evaluated by SPSS 17.0 Programme to determine percentages, frequencies and t-test for correlated survey. Finally, 10 teachers are interviewed in order to examine the attitudes of teachers in greater depth. As a result of this study, teachers' attitude scores using traditional methods is very low towards the proofs and mathematical modeling show higher scores in the attitude towards the proofs. In addition it is revealed that the candidates think the proof with modeling more understanding, easy and effective than the traditional method. It is recommended to integrate the proof process and the modeling process. However, it may be suggested that different proofs in different areas of mathematics should be evaluated at different levels in mathematical modeling process.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherElsevier Science Bven_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.349en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectKey Thoughten_US
dc.subjectModelingen_US
dc.subjectMathematical Modelingen_US
dc.subjectProofen_US
dc.subjectReasoningen_US
dc.titleThe attitudes of the elementary school mathematics teacher candidates towards proof in the mathematical modelling proccessen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.relation.journal5th World Conference on Educational Sciencesen_US
dc.contributor.departmentNecatibey Eğitim Fakültesien_US
dc.identifier.volume116en_US
dc.identifier.startpage1083en_US
dc.identifier.endpage1087en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryKonferans Öğesi - Uluslararası - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Thumbnail

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster