Gelişmiş Arama

Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorTuner, Hasan
dc.contributor.authorFattibene, Paola
dc.contributor.authorTrompier, Francois
dc.contributor.authorWieser, Albrecht
dc.contributor.authorBrai, Maria
dc.contributor.authorDe Angelis, Cinzia
dc.contributor.authorDella Monaca, Sara
dc.contributor.authorGarcia, Tristan
dc.date.accessioned2019-10-17T10:39:59Z
dc.date.available2019-10-17T10:39:59Z
dc.date.issued2014en_US
dc.identifier.issn0301-634X
dc.identifier.issn1432-2099
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00411-014-0533-x
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12462/8212
dc.descriptionTuner,Tasan (Balıkesir Author)en_US
dc.description.abstractThis paper presents the results of an interlaboratory comparison of retrospective dosimetry using the electron paramagnetic resonance method. The test material used in this exercise was glass coming from the touch screens of smart phones that might be used as fortuitous dosimeters in a large-scale radiological incident. There were 13 participants to whom samples were dispatched, and 11 laboratories reported results. The participants received five calibration samples (0, 0.8, 2, 4, and 10 Gy) and four blindly irradiated samples (0, 0.9, 1.3, and 3.3 Gy). Participants were divided into two groups: for group A (formed by three participants), samples came from a homogeneous batch of glass and were stored in similar setting; for group B (formed by eight participants), samples came from different smart phones and stored in different settings of light and temperature. The calibration curves determined by the participants of group A had a small error and a critical level in the 0.37-0.40-Gy dose range, whereas the curves determined by the participants of group B were more scattered and led to a critical level in the 1.3-3.2-Gy dose range for six participants out of eight. Group A were able to assess the dose within 20 % for the lowest doses (< 1.5 Gy) and within 5 % for the highest doses. For group B, only the highest blind dose could be evaluated in a reliable way because of the high critical values involved. The results from group A are encouraging, whereas the results from group B suggest that the influence of environmental conditions and the intervariability of samples coming from different smart phones need to be further investigated. An alongside conclusion is that the protocol was easily transferred to participants making a network of laboratories in case of a mass casualty event potentially feasible.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipEuropean Union 241536 European Union under EURADOS 7th Framework Programme 295513en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherSpringeren_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1007/s00411-014-0533-xen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccessen_US
dc.subjectEPR Dosimetryen_US
dc.subjectRadiological Emergencyen_US
dc.subjectRetrospective Dosimetryen_US
dc.subjectGlassen_US
dc.titleEPR dosimetry intercomparison using smart phone touch screen glassen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.relation.journalRadiation and Environmental Biophysicsen_US
dc.contributor.departmentFen Edebiyat Fakültesien_US
dc.contributor.authorID0000-0002-3109-9344en_US
dc.contributor.authorID0000-0002-0091-3243en_US
dc.contributor.authorID0000-0001-8091-6040en_US
dc.contributor.authorID0000-0001-7073-8594en_US
dc.contributor.authorID0000-0002-8204-0414en_US
dc.contributor.authorID0000-0002-6736-8147en_US
dc.contributor.authorID0000-0002-0546-3608en_US
dc.contributor.authorID0000-0002-8776-6572en_US
dc.contributor.authorID0000-0003-4151-8810en_US
dc.identifier.volume53en_US
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.startpage311en_US
dc.identifier.endpage320en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Thumbnail

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster