Gelişmiş Arama

Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorBaşer, Banu Güleç
dc.contributor.authorTaşkın, Mine Islimye
dc.contributor.authorAdalı, Ertan
dc.contributor.authorÖztürk, Emine
dc.contributor.authorHişmioğulları, Adnan Adil
dc.contributor.authorYay, Arzu
dc.date.accessioned2019-10-17T06:36:52Z
dc.date.available2019-10-17T06:36:52Z
dc.date.issued2016en_US
dc.identifier.issn0951-3590
dc.identifier.issn1473-0766
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12462/7328
dc.descriptionBaşer, Banu Güleç (Balikesir Author)en_US
dc.description.abstractContext: There is number of studies about neuroprotective effects of progesterone against global cerebral ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) injury. Objective: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the protective effect of the progesterone (PG) against ovarian I/R injury by biochemical and histopathologic parameters. Methods: 21 Female wistar albino rats were utilized for creating three groups. Group 1: Sham, Group 2: I/R, Group 3: IR+PG (8 mg/kg). Progesterone was administered intraperitoneally into the rats in group 3, 30 minutes before detorsion operation. Main Outcome Measure(s): Ovarian ischemia-reperfusion injury evaluated in serum and tissue by using biochemical parameters including malondialdehyde (MDA), total antioxidant status (TAS), total oxidant status (TOS), oxidative stress index (OSI), Neutrophil GelatinaseAssociated Lipocalin (NGAL) and immunoflourescence staining by TUNEL method was also studied.Results: Serum and tissue TOS levels were significantly lower in group 3 than group 2. Only tissue TAS levels were higher in group 3 than group 2 (p50.001). NGAL and MDA levels were similar between the groups. Histologic score including vascular congestion, hemorrhage, polymorphonuclear neutrophils, and interstitial edema was higher in group 2. Pre-treatment with progesterone decreased the score but this difference was not statistically significant. Apoptotic cell number was higher in group 2 than group 1 and 3. It was seen that the number of apoptotic cells was increased in the I/R group. TUNEL-positive cell number gradually decreased with progesterone in group 3. Conclusion: Conservative treatment with progesterone is beneficial for I/R injury, as progesterone has an ovarian protective effects by antiapopitotic and antioxidative properties.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherTaylor & Francis Ltden_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectEndocrinology & Metabolismen_US
dc.subjectObstetrics & Gynecologyen_US
dc.titleDoes progesterone have protective effects on ovarian I/R injury?en_US
dc.typeotheren_US
dc.relation.journalGynecological Endocrinologyen_US
dc.contributor.departmentTıp Fakültesien_US
dc.identifier.volume32en_US
dc.identifier.startpage139en_US
dc.identifier.endpage139en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryDiğeren_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

DosyalarBoyutBiçimGöster

Bu öğe ile ilişkili dosya yok.

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster