dc.contributor.author | Öztürk, S. | |
dc.contributor.author | Kutlu, Ali | |
dc.contributor.author | Kartal, Özgür | |
dc.contributor.author | Güleç, Mustafa | |
dc.contributor.author | Çalışkaner, Zafer | |
dc.contributor.author | Erel, Fuat | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-10-16T11:42:15Z | |
dc.date.available | 2019-10-16T11:42:15Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2011 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | eISSN: 1398-9995 | |
dc.identifier.uri | 0105-4538 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12462/7172 | |
dc.description | Erel, Fuat (Balikesir Author) | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | ntroduction:H1-antihistamines are widelyused to relieve symptoms of allergic disor-ders. A few skins reactions to H1-antihista-mines have been described in the literature.Histamine H1-antagonists can cause con-tact and photocontact dermatitis, but skinreactions provoked by their systemic useare very rare. We report two cases of anti-histamines-induced urticaria during 7 yearsin our allergy department.Case 1:A 39-year-old woman wasadmitted because of a second cutaneouseruption with the same morphologic fea-tures as before. The first eruption appearedafter 2 h of Cetirizin 10 mg oral intake, thesecond eruption appeared after 1 h ofCetirizin intake. Healing was obtainedafter stopping the medication.Case 2:A 25-years-old man suffering froma drug reaction attributed to the oralintake of Mebhydrolin 50 mg. He is anatopic patient with seasonal perennial rhi-nitis and marked hypersensitivity to thegrass pollen who is receiving inhaled corti-costeroids. He visited because of the gener-alized morbilliform eruptions with pruritusover his whole body, after intake of Meb-hydrolin. Previously, he had presented thesame cutaneous reactions after oral admin-istration of Mebhydrolin.Methods and results:Prick tests with anti-histamines (Mebhydrolin and Cetirizin)were negative. Oral challenge tests withantihistamines were performed. Thepatients developed generalized urticarialeruptions approximately 3 h after intakeMebhydrolin and Cetirizin. These reactionspersisted for 6–12 h.Conclusion:Oral challenge tests with addi-tives are not reliable, as the different for-mulations differ in their production.Although antihistamines are used in aller-gic disorders, allergy to these drugs mustbe considered when cutaneous lesionsappear during the treatment. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | eng | en_US |
dc.publisher | Wiley-Blackwell | en_US |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | en_US |
dc.subject | Allergy | en_US |
dc.title | Adverse reactions to antihistamines | en_US |
dc.type | other | en_US |
dc.relation.journal | Allergy | en_US |
dc.contributor.department | Tıp Fakültesi | en_US |
dc.identifier.volume | 66 | en_US |
dc.identifier.startpage | 178 | en_US |
dc.identifier.endpage | 178 | en_US |
dc.relation.publicationcategory | Diğer | en_US |