Gelişmiş Arama

Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorGüner, Barış
dc.contributor.authorBilen, Ebru Karakaya
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-16T06:17:37Z
dc.date.available2024-02-16T06:17:37Z
dc.date.issued2022en_US
dc.identifier.issn2602-3695
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.47748/tjvr.1120029
dc.identifier.urihttps://search.trdizin.gov.tr/yayin/detay/1164739
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12462/14519
dc.descriptionGüner, Barış (Balikesir Author)en_US
dc.description.abstractObjective: The aim of this study was to compare the fertility parameters in response to pregnant mare serum gonadotropin (conventional treatment) or gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (alternative treatment) in Romanov sheep subjected to a 7-d short-term protocol during non-breeding season. Materials and Methods: All sheep (n:57) were subjected to short-term synchronization protocol. Intravaginal sponge impregnated with 20 mg fluorogestone acetate was inserted for 7 days and all sheep received 125 µg cloprostenol at sponge removal. Sheep were randomly assigned to receive no additional treatment (CON, n:16), 240 IU pregnant mare serum gonadotropin (PMSG, n:24) at sponge removal or 10 µg buserelin acetate (GnRH, n:17) at 30 h after sponge removal. Natural mating was performed following detection of estrous with fertile eight Romanov rams. Estrous response, pregnancy rate, lambing rate, and litter size were compared among groups. Results: Estrous response and pregnancy rate were 86% and 75.4% in all sheep, respectively. Estrous response was numerically higher about 7% (p>0.05) in treatment groups (PMSG, 87.5%; GnRH, 88.2%) than CON (81.2%). However, pregnancy rate was numerically higher (p>0.05) in PMSG (83.3%) than GnRH (70.6%) and CON (68.7%). Similarly, lambing rate in the PMSG (79.1%) was approximately 15% numerically greater (p>0.05) than in GnRH (64.7%) and CON (62.5%). In addition, litter size in PMSG (2.1) was also numerically higher (p>0.05) than GnRH (1.9) and CON (1.9). Conclusion: The use of GnRH provided similar estrous response compared to use of PMSG in Romanov sheep synchronized with short-term protocol. However, use of PMSG provided numerically higher pregnancy rate, lambing rate, and litter size than use of GnRH. Considering the serious ethical concerns and animal welfare for the production of PMSG, it is necessary to use alternative gonadotropins. Comprehensive studies are needed to compare the fertility parameters between application of PMSG and GnRH in Romanov sheep.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherEbubekir Ceylanen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.47748/tjvr.1120029en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/us/*
dc.subjectPMSGen_US
dc.subjectGnRHen_US
dc.subjectFertilityen_US
dc.subjectRomanoven_US
dc.subjectSheepen_US
dc.titleComparison of fertility parameters in Romanov sheep synchronized with progesterone-based protocol plus PMSG or GnRHen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.relation.journalTurkish Journal of Veterinary Researchen_US
dc.contributor.departmentVeteriner Fakültesien_US
dc.contributor.authorID0000-0001-6414-6752en_US
dc.contributor.authorID0000-0003-4837-1858en_US
dc.identifier.volume6en_US
dc.identifier.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.startpage61en_US
dc.identifier.endpage66en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Ulusal Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Thumbnail

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster

info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Aksi belirtilmediği sürece bu öğenin lisansı: info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess