Gelişmiş Arama

Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorAdilay, Hüseyin Utku
dc.contributor.authorAydın, Ilhan
dc.contributor.authorSahin, Balkan
dc.contributor.authorKatar, Salim
dc.contributor.authorÜçer, Melih
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-05T15:58:37Z
dc.date.available2024-02-05T15:58:37Z
dc.date.issued2022
dc.identifier.issn2148-273X
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.14744/iksstd.2021.72335
dc.identifier.urihttps://search.trdizin.gov.tr/yayin/detay/525280
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12462/14160
dc.description.abstractObjective: Lower back pain is the most common disease of the musculoskeletal system. Analgesics, myorelaxant drugs, bed rest, physical therapy, and conventional treatments are first-line treatments for lower back pain. In addition, conventional radiofrequency thermocoagulation (RFT) and caudal steroid injection (CSI) are common conventional therapies. The present study aims to compare the results of RFT alone with combination therapy using RFT and CSI. The effectiveness of these treatment methods in patients with chronic lower back pain is evaluated. Method: A total of 62 patients with lower back pain who underwent epidural CSI and RFT in neurosurgery clinic between January 2018 and May 2019 were included. Results: Of the 62 patients included in the study, RFT+CSI was performed in 30 patients (48.3%). A visual analog scale (VAS) scores before and after the procedure; a statistically significant difference was only observed between the RFT+CSI and RFT group scores (p=0.030) in the sixth month after the procedure, and it was observed that the pain decreased more in the RFT+CSI group. Conclusion: The present study considered body mass index (BMI), occupation, gender, age, and procedure levels. We conclude that both RFT and RFT+CSI are effective treatment methods for chronic lower back pain that does not improve after conservative or physical therapy. BMI has a direct effect on lower back pain. The VAS score decreased significantly in patients who underwent both the RFT and RFT+CSI procedures, and RFT+CSI appeared more effective in terms of the 6-month VAS score.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.relation.ispartofİstanbul Kanuni Sultan Süleyman Tıp Dergisien_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.titleComparison of Radiofrequency Thermocoagulation Alone with Radiofrequency Thermocoagulation and Steroid Injection in Combination for the Treatment of Lower Back Painen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.contributor.departmentBalıkesir Üniversitesien_US
dc.identifier.volume14en_US
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.startpage1en_US
dc.identifier.endpage7en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Ulusal Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.buozeltrdizinidealen_US]
dc.department-tempBalıkesir Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi, Beyin Cerrahisi Anabilim Dalı, Balıkesir, Türkiye Kanuni Sultan Süleyman Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi Nörolojik Cerrahi Anabilim Dalı, İstanbul, Türkiye Şişli Hamidiye Etfal Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi Nöroşirürji Anabilim Dalı, İstanbul, Türkiye Balıkesir Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi, Beyin Cerrahisi Anabilim Dalı, Balıkesir, Türkiye Biruni Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi, Nörolojik Cerrahi Anabilim Dalı, İstanbul, Türkiyeen_US
dc.identifier.trdizinid525280en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.14744/iksstd.2021.72335


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

DosyalarBoyutBiçimGöster

Bu öğe ile ilişkili dosya yok.

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster