Gelişmiş Arama

Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorEşkin, Mehmet Burak
dc.contributor.authorCeylan, Ayşegül
dc.contributor.authorÖzhan, Mehmet Öz̈gür
dc.contributor.authorAtik, Bülent
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-09T06:36:34Z
dc.date.available2021-03-09T06:36:34Z
dc.date.issued2020en_US
dc.identifier.issn0003-2417
dc.identifier.issn1432-055X
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s00101-020-00848-w
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12462/11159
dc.descriptionAtik, Bülent (Balikesir Author)en_US
dc.description.abstractBackground: In recent years, promising results were achieved with the use of ultrasound (US)-guided interfascial plane blocks for effective postoperative analgesia in several surgeries. Erector spina plane (ESP) block and mid-transverse to pleura plane (MTP) block are the latest techniques in this area. The aim of this prospective and randomized study was to compare the postoperative analgesic efficacy of bilateral ESP and MTP blocks in patients undergoing lumbar spinal surgery under general anesthesia (GA). Methods: A total of 120 adult patients were included in the study and randomized into 3 groups: group ESP (n = 40), group MTP (n = 40) and group Control (n = 40). The patients in the group ESP received a bilateral block by injecting 20 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine at a vertebrae level in the mid-point of the incision before GA. The same LA was administrated bilaterally at the T12/L1 level in the group MTP. Postoperatively, a multimodal analgesic regimen including an intravenous tramadol patient-controlled analgesia (PCA), paracetamol and dexketoprofen was used in all groups. Postoperative pain was assessed using a visual analogue scale (VAS) during the first 48 postoperative hours. Pethidine was used as a rescue analgesic when VAS score was >3. Primary outcome measure was mean pain scores. Secondary outcome measures were consumption of rescue analgesic and the amount of tramadol delivered by PCA. A p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: Mean VAS scores were significantly higher in the group Control than in the group MTP and group ESP at all-time points during 48 h (Control > MTP > ESP; p < 0.001). Mean VAS scores were lower in group ESP than group MTP in postoperative 12 h (p < 0.001). Rescue analgesic consumption, number of bolus demand on PCA, PCA bolus demand dose, total PCA dose, and complications related to opioid consumption were highest in control group and lowest in ESP group (Control > MTP > ESP; p < 0.001). Conclusion: Both ESP and MTP blocks provided effective pain relief after lumbar spinal surgery but the ESP block was superior to MTP block regarding postoperative analgesia in the first 24 h.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherSpringer Heidelbergen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1007/s00101-020-00848-wen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccessen_US
dc.subjectLumbar Spinal Surgeryen_US
dc.subjectErector Spinae Plane Blocken_US
dc.subjectMid-Tranverse To Pleura Blocken_US
dc.subjectPostoperative Analgesiaen_US
dc.subjectVisual Analogue Scaleen_US
dc.titleUltrasound-guided erector spinae block versus mid-transverse process to pleura block for postoperative analgesia in lumbar spinal surgeryen_US
dc.title.alternativeUltraschallgeführter „Erector-spinae-plane“-Block gegenüber „Mid-transverse-to-pleura“-Block für die postoperative Analgesie in der lumbalen Wirbelsäulenchirurgieen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.relation.journalAnaesthesisten_US
dc.contributor.departmentTıp Fakültesien_US
dc.contributor.authorID0000-0001-6781-9334en_US
dc.identifier.volume69en_US
dc.identifier.issue10en_US
dc.identifier.startpage742en_US
dc.identifier.endpage750en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Thumbnail

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster