Gelişmiş Arama

Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorÖzyürek, Selahattin
dc.contributor.authorAtik, Aziz
dc.contributor.authorTurgut, Hasan
dc.contributor.authorAkyıldız, Faruk
dc.date.accessioned2020-01-21T11:53:08Z
dc.date.available2020-01-21T11:53:08Z
dc.date.issued2015en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12462/10515
dc.descriptionAtik, Aziz (Balikesir Author)en_US
dc.description.abstractWe read the original article entitled “Comparison of different methods of femoral fixation anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (1) in the issue of Acta Med Iran 2013;51(7):444-8, with great interest. We would like to commend the authors for their clinically relevant work. However, we believe that some important additional comments and observations seem necessary to be contributed through this study. In this article, the authors has stated that, they found only one study in which Uribe et al., studied posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with AperFix and to the best of their knowledge, their study was the only study comparing Endobutton, Rigidfix and Aperfix with each other. Nevertheless, we would like to call the attention of the readers to the fact that that there are several other studies referring this technique.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherMedical Sciences University of Teheranen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectAnterior Cruciate Ligament Injuryen_US
dc.titleDifferent femoral fixation techniques in reconstruction of anterior cruciate ligamenten_US
dc.typeletteren_US
dc.relation.journalActa Medica Iranicaen_US
dc.contributor.departmentTıp Fakültesien_US
dc.identifier.volume53en_US
dc.identifier.issue7en_US
dc.identifier.startpage452en_US
dc.identifier.endpage453en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryDiğeren_US


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Thumbnail

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster