Staging practices and breast cancer stage among population-based registries in the MENA region
View/ Open
Access
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAttribution 3.0 United Stateshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/us/Date
2022Author
Pineros, MarionGinsburg, Ophira
Bendahhou, Karima
Eser, Sultan
Shelpai, Wael A.
Fouad, Heba
Znaor, Ariana
Staging Survey Grp
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Background: Availability of stage information by population-based cancer registries (PBCR) remains scarce for
diverse reasons. Nevertheless, stage is critical cancer control information particularly for cancers amenable to
early detection. In the framework of the Global Initiative for Cancer Registry Development (GICR), we present
the status of stage data collection and dissemination among registries in the Middle East and Northern Africa
(MENA) region as well as the stage distribution of breast cancer patients.
Methods: A web-based survey exploring staging practices and breast cancer stage was developed and sent to 30
PBCR in 18 countries of the MENA region.
Results: Among 23 respondent PBCR, 21 collected stage data, the majority (80%) for all cancers. Fourteen registries used a single classification (9 TNM and 5 SEER), 7 used both staging systems in parallel. Out of 12,888
breast cancer patients (seven registries) 27.7% had unknown TNM stage (11.1% in Oman, 46% in Annaba).
When considering only cases with known stage, 65.3% were early cancers (TNM I+II), ranging from 57.9% in
Oman to 83.3% in Batna (Algeria), and 9.9% were stage IV cancers. Among the nine registries providing SEER
Summary stage for breast cancer cases, stage was unknown in 19% of the cases, (0 in Bahrain, 39% in Kuwait).
Stage data were largely absent from the published registry reports.
Conclusion: Despite wide stage data collection by cancer registries, missing information and low dissemination
clearly limit informing efforts on early detection. The use of two classification systems in parallel implies
additional workload and might undermine completeness. The favourable results of early cancer (TNM I+II) in
two thirds of breast cancer patients needs to be interpreted with caution and followed up in time. Although
efforts to improve quality of stage data are needed, our findings are particularly relevant to the WHO Global
Breast Cancer Initiative.
Source
Cancer EpidemiologyVolume
81Issue
DecemberCollections
The following license files are associated with this item: